lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490191473.28249.9.camel@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:04:33 +0000
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] arm64: Do not expose PCI mmap through procfs

On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 09:54 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 3/22/2017 9:25 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > +#ifdef __aarch64__
> > +/* ARM64 wants to be special and not expose this through /proc
> > like everyone else */
> > +#undef HAVE_PCI_MMAP
> > +#endif
> > +
> Where is this ARM64 special requirement coming from?

The idea is that as a new platform, ARM64 shouldn't need to implement
legacy userspace interfaces.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/422571.html

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (4938 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ