[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322155817.GA18960@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:58:17 -0400
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yi Zhang <yizhan@...hat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: don't complete un-started request in timeout
handler
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:03:59PM -0400, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 10:14 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > When iterating busy requests in timeout handler,
> > if the STARTED flag of one request isn't set, that means
> > the request is being processed in block layer or driver, and
> > isn't submitted to hardware yet.
> >
> > In current implementation of blk_mq_check_expired(),
> > if the request queue becomes dying, un-started requests are
> > handled as being completed/freed immediately. This way is
> > wrong, and can cause rq corruption or double allocation[1][2],
> > when doing I/O and removing&resetting NVMe device at the sametime.
>
> I agree, completing it looks bogus. If the request is in a scheduler or
> on a software queue, this won't end well at all. Looks like it was
> introduced by this patch:
>
> commit eb130dbfc40eabcd4e10797310bda6b9f6dd7e76
> Author: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Date: Thu Jan 8 08:59:53 2015 -0700
>
> blk-mq: End unstarted requests on a dying queue
>
> Before that, we just ignored it. Keith?
The above was intended for a stopped hctx on a dying queue such that
there's nothing in flight to the driver. Nvme had been relying on this
to end unstarted requests so we may progress when a controller dies.
We've since obviated the need: we restart the hw queues to flush entered
requests to failure, so we don't need that brokenness.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists