linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: write better comments for weight calculations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJWu+opS0k14_uX=EJv49RyH2jPwZzNvs-XzdQa00W2=2Z2LOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:25:02 -0700
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: write better comments for weight calculations

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:47:43PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> This patch rewrites comments related task priorities and CPU usage
>> along with an example to show how it works.
>
> To what purpose? Bigger word count?

The intention is to improve the comments to make it more
understandable (the weight calculations, factor of 1.25 etc).

On reading through the comments the first time, I felt they could be
improved. Is your concern more about the addition of an example
increasing the word-count? Perhaps you'd rather this be added to
Documentation/ instead?

Regards,
Joel