[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322164932.GA1992@potion>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:49:33 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: x86: fix illegal MP_STATE when in/entering SMM
2017-03-22 16:53+0100, David Hildenbrand:
> If we already entered/are about to enter SMM, don't allow
> switching to INIT/SIPI_RECEIVED, otherwise the next call to
> kvm_apic_accept_events() will report a warning.
>
> Fixes: cd7764fe9f73 ("KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.2+
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 1faf620..7d0ec1b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7355,6 +7355,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> mp_state->mp_state != KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* INITs are latched while in SMM */
> + if ((is_smm(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.smi_pending) &&
I think that userspace can still set the mpstate first and then enter
SMM with KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, which would result in the same warning ...
Don't we need a similar check in kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events()?
Thanks.
> + (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED ||
> + mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
> vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists