[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490202751-16581-1-git-send-email-lionel.debieve@st.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:12:31 +0100
From: Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
To: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
CC: <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: st-asc: Make the locking RT aware
The lock is a sleeping lock and local_irq_save() is not the
standard implementation now. Working for both -RT and non
RT.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c b/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
index c334bcc..4889396 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
@@ -887,13 +887,12 @@ static void asc_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned count)
int locked = 1;
u32 intenable;
- local_irq_save(flags);
if (port->sysrq)
locked = 0; /* asc_interrupt has already claimed the lock */
else if (oops_in_progress)
- locked = spin_trylock(&port->lock);
+ locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
else
- spin_lock(&port->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
/*
* Disable interrupts so we don't get the IRQ line bouncing
@@ -911,8 +910,7 @@ static void asc_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned count)
asc_out(port, ASC_INTEN, intenable);
if (locked)
- spin_unlock(&port->lock);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
}
static int asc_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists