linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65ecf56a-7e45-30d3-649c-798f8037a636@cogentembedded.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:56:14 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver

Hello!

On 03/22/2017 08:49 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

>>> Add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>>
>> There are some checkpatch suggestions that are worth fixing, I think.
>>
>> [PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:277: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> [PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:320: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> [PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:489: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!mem"
>
> Will be fixed in v3, thanks.
>
> [ My scripts didn't run checkpatch with --strict so I haven't noticed them. ]

   --strict'ly speaking, this switch is only forced on in the networking 
trees. :-)

> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics

MBR, Sergei