[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322181846.GN30655@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:18:46 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: sean.wang@...iatek.com
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Landen.Chao@...iatek.com, keyhaede@...il.com,
objelf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net-next: ethernet: mediatek: add
device_node of GMAC pointing into the netdev instance
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:35:09PM +0800, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
>
> the patch adds the setup of the corresponding device node of GMAC into the
> netdev instance which could allow other modules such as DSA to find the
> instance through the node in dt-bindings using of_find_net_device_by_node()
> call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index c21ed99..84b09a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -2323,6 +2323,8 @@ static int mtk_add_mac(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct device_node *np)
> eth->netdev[id]->ethtool_ops = &mtk_ethtool_ops;
>
> eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[0];
> + eth->netdev[id]->dev.of_node = np;
> +
Humm, O.K. This is not obvious, until you look at of_dev_node_match()
in net-sysfs.c.
Most Ethernet drivers don't set netdev.dev.of_node. But they do call
SET_NETDEV_DEV(), which sets netdev.dev.parent.
of_dev_node_match() first looks at netdev.dev.parent->of_node, and if that
does not match, then looks at netdev.dev.of_node.
For the mtk Ethernet driver, the parent is not going to work, because
of the sub devices. So netdev.dev.of_node does need to be set.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists