linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <21FCFC89-07EE-49EE-81C2-A138DD4C5F99@holtmann.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:23:15 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to
 rpmsg

Hi Dave,

>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>> 
>> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually
>> exclusive we have to change all client drivers in one commit, to make
>> sure we have a working system before and after this transition.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> 
>> Based on v4.11-rc3 with Arnd's Kconfig dependency fixes for BT_QCOMSMD
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/1038).
> 
> Just some questions since I'm supposed to merge this into my net-next
> tree.
> 
> What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be
> getting it?

I acked that one separately and added you:

[PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btqcomsmd: fix compile-test dependency

> Second, should I merge all three of these patches to net-next or just
> this one?

I think you have to take all 3 patches. Otherwise it will break.

Regards

Marcel