[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323064337.GD22801@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:43:37 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the
usb-gadget-fixes tree
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:16:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 1f459262b0e1 ("usb: gadget: udc: remove pointer dereference after free")
>
> from the usb-gadget-fixes tree and commit:
>
> d293408ef303 ("usb: gadget: pch_udc: Replace PCI pool old API")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> index 8a365aad66fe,84dcbcd756f0..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> @@@ -1522,7 -1522,8 +1522,7 @@@ static void pch_udc_free_dma_chain(stru
> /* do not free first desc., will be done by free for request */
> td = phys_to_virt(addr);
> addr2 = (dma_addr_t)td->next;
> - pci_pool_free(dev->data_requests, td, addr);
> + dma_pool_free(dev->data_requests, td, addr);
> - td->next = 0x00;
> addr = addr2;
> }
> req->chain_len = 1;
Looks good to me, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists