[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323074201.qufsm2h6hvndrfdy@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:42:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Prefer sibiling only if local group is
under-utilized
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:27:50PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> @@ -7536,8 +7537,8 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> * the tasks on the system).
> */
> if (prefer_sibling && sds->local &&
> - group_has_capacity(env, &sds->local_stat) &&
> - (sgs->sum_nr_running > 1)) {
> + group_has_capacity(env, local) &&
> + (sgs->sum_nr_running > local->sum_nr_running + 1)) {
> sgs->group_no_capacity = 1;
> sgs->group_type = group_classify(sg, sgs);
> }
Ah, yes that makes sense!
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists