[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490260051-6046-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:07:31 +0800
From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
CC: <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6] vfio error recovery: kernel support
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
0. What happens now (PCIE AER only)
Fatal errors cause a link reset. Non fatal errors don't.
All errors stop the QEMU guest eventually, but not immediately,
because it's detected and reported asynchronously.
Interrupts are forwarded as usual.
Correctable errors are not reported to user at all.
Note:
PPC EEH is different, but this approach won't affect EEH. EEH treat
all errors as fatal ones in AER, so they will still be signalled to user
via the legacy eventfd. Besides, all devices/functions in a PE belongs
to the same IOMMU group, so the slot_reset handler in this approach
won't affect EEH either.
1. Correctable errors
Hardware can correct these errors without software intervention,
clear the error status is enough, this is what already done now.
No need to recover it, nothing changed, leave it as it is.
2. Fatal errors
They will induce a link reset. This is troublesome when user is
a QEMU guest. This approach doesn't touch the existing mechanism.
3. Non-fatal errors
Before this patch, they are signalled to user the same way as fatal ones.
With this patch, a new eventfd is introduced only for non-fatal error
notification. By splitting non-fatal ones out, it will benefit AER
recovery of a QEMU guest user.
To maintain backwards compatibility with userspace, non-fatal errors
will continue to trigger via the existing error interrupt index if a
non-fatal signaling mechanism has not been registered.
Note:
In case of PCI Express errors, kernel might request a slot reset
affecting our device (from our point of view this is a passive device
reset as opposed to an active one requested by vfio itself).
This might currently happen if a slot reset is requested by a driver
(other than vfio) bound to another device function in the same slot.
This will cause our device to lose its state so report this event to
userspace.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
v6 changelog:
Address all the comments from MST.
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
index 324c52e..71f9a8a 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
@@ -441,7 +441,9 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_irq_count(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int irq_type)
return (flags & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE) + 1;
}
- } else if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX) {
+ } else if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX ||
+ irq_type == VFIO_PCI_NON_FATAL_ERR_IRQ_INDEX ||
+ irq_type == VFIO_PCI_PASSIVE_RESET_IRQ_INDEX) {
if (pci_is_pcie(vdev->pdev))
return 1;
} else if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX) {
@@ -796,6 +798,8 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
case VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX:
break;
case VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX:
+ case VFIO_PCI_NON_FATAL_ERR_IRQ_INDEX:
+ case VFIO_PCI_PASSIVE_RESET_IRQ_INDEX:
if (pci_is_pcie(vdev->pdev))
break;
/* pass thru to return error */
@@ -1282,7 +1286,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t vfio_pci_aer_err_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
- if (vdev->err_trigger)
+ if (state == pci_channel_io_normal && vdev->non_fatal_err_trigger)
+ eventfd_signal(vdev->non_fatal_err_trigger, 1);
+ else if (vdev->err_trigger)
eventfd_signal(vdev->err_trigger, 1);
mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
@@ -1292,8 +1298,47 @@ static pci_ers_result_t vfio_pci_aer_err_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
}
+/*
+ * In case of PCI Express errors, kernel might request a slot reset
+ * affecting our device (from our point of view, this is a passive device
+ * reset as opposed to an active one requested by vfio itself).
+ * This might currently happen if a slot reset is requested by a driver
+ * (other than vfio) bound to another device function in the same slot.
+ * This will cause our device to lose its state, so report this event to
+ * userspace.
+ */
+static pci_ers_result_t vfio_pci_aer_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct vfio_pci_device *vdev;
+ struct vfio_device *device;
+ static pci_ers_result_t err = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
+
+ device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!device)
+ goto err_dev;
+
+ vdev = vfio_device_data(device);
+ if (!vdev)
+ goto err_data;
+
+ mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
+
+ if (vdev->passive_reset_trigger)
+ eventfd_signal(vdev->passive_reset_trigger, 1);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
+
+ err = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
+
+err_data:
+ vfio_device_put(device);
+err_dev:
+ return err;
+}
+
static const struct pci_error_handlers vfio_err_handlers = {
.error_detected = vfio_pci_aer_err_detected,
+ .slot_reset = vfio_pci_aer_slot_reset,
};
static struct pci_driver vfio_pci_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
index 1c46045..7157d85 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
@@ -611,6 +611,28 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_err_trigger(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
count, flags, data);
}
+static int vfio_pci_set_non_fatal_err_trigger(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
+ unsigned index, unsigned start,
+ unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data)
+{
+ if (index != VFIO_PCI_NON_FATAL_ERR_IRQ_INDEX || start != 0 || count > 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return vfio_pci_set_ctx_trigger_single(&vdev->non_fatal_err_trigger,
+ count, flags, data);
+}
+
+static int vfio_pci_set_passive_reset_trigger(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
+ unsigned index, unsigned start,
+ unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data)
+{
+ if (index != VFIO_PCI_PASSIVE_RESET_IRQ_INDEX || start != 0 || count > 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return vfio_pci_set_ctx_trigger_single(&vdev->passive_reset_trigger,
+ count, flags, data);
+}
+
static int vfio_pci_set_req_trigger(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
unsigned index, unsigned start,
unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data)
@@ -664,6 +686,22 @@ int vfio_pci_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, uint32_t flags,
break;
}
break;
+ case VFIO_PCI_NON_FATAL_ERR_IRQ_INDEX:
+ switch (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TYPE_MASK) {
+ case VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER:
+ if (pci_is_pcie(vdev->pdev))
+ func = vfio_pci_set_non_fatal_err_trigger;
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ case VFIO_PCI_PASSIVE_RESET_IRQ_INDEX:
+ switch (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TYPE_MASK) {
+ case VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER:
+ if (pci_is_pcie(vdev->pdev))
+ func = vfio_pci_set_passive_reset_trigger;
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
case VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX:
switch (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TYPE_MASK) {
case VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER:
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
index f561ac1..cbc4b88 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
struct pci_saved_state *pci_saved_state;
int refcnt;
struct eventfd_ctx *err_trigger;
+ struct eventfd_ctx *non_fatal_err_trigger;
+ struct eventfd_ctx *passive_reset_trigger;
struct eventfd_ctx *req_trigger;
struct list_head dummy_resources_list;
};
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
index 519eff3..26b4be0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
@@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ enum {
VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX,
VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX,
VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
+ VFIO_PCI_NON_FATAL_ERR_IRQ_INDEX,
+ VFIO_PCI_PASSIVE_RESET_IRQ_INDEX,
VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS
};
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists