[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbcnuPGQGuNG-0ZdARbKdJRMrXGZsoeG4NPVFTMg5p6sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:20:06 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:24 PM, John Keeping <john@...anate.com> wrote:
> The aim of the series is to make the Rockchip pinctrl irq_chip
> implementation safe for use with RT_FULL which requires that raw
> spinlocks are used to avoid sleeping in hardirq context.
>
> This is the same as version 2 [1] with the 2.1 version of patch 1
> included, but I'm rolling it up as a new version so it's simpler to
> apply.
This v3 does not apply either so please rebase and resend.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists