[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323102037.GD16625@Red>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:20:37 +0100
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: stmmac: Performance regression after commit aff3d9eff843 "net:
stmmac: enable multiple buffers"
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:12:18AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> Hi Corentin,
>
> Às 10:08 AM de 3/23/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu:
> > Hello
> >
> > Using next-20170323 produce a huge performance regression on my sunxi boards.
> > On dwmac-sun8i, iperf goes from 94mbs/s to 37 when sending.
> >
> > On cubieboard2(dwmac-sunxi), iperf made the kernel flood with "ndesc_get_rx_status: Oversized frame spanned multiple buffers"
> > and network is lost after.
> >
> > Reverting aff3d9eff84399e433c4aca65a9bb236581bc082 fix the issue.
> > I still try to found which part of this patch mades the performance lower.
> >
> > Regards
> > Corentin Labbe
> >
>
> I have a 4.21 QoS Core with 4 RX + 4 TX and detected no regression.
> Could you please share the iperf cmds you are using in order for me to reproduce
> in my side?
simple iperf -c serverip for both board
Powered by blists - more mailing lists