lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703231146060.3982@nanos>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:56:17 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [v1 0/9] Early boot time stamps for x86

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Yes, I am certain it is 0 or  near 0 on reset on this machine. Because, I

Emphasis on "this machine'

It's not guaranteed especially not on reboot and not with creative BIOSes
fiddling with the TSC_ADJUST value. 

 - It CANNOT be used to measure BIOS boot time reliably

 - If BIOS wreckaged TSC_ADJUST, then your whole time stamping goes out the
   window once the kernel sanitized it.

See other mail.

Thanks,

	tglx


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ