[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490274576.19767.189.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:09:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: core: Preserve PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 11:21 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > There is a potential flaw if cell has id > 0 and is going to be
> > registered with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE.
> >
> > Ignore if PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE is supplied.
>
> This is a substantial change to a pretty tried and tested piece of
> sub-system code. Can you put some more meat on the bones in the
> commit log, and include examples.
Example in pseudo code:
cells = {
[0] = { .id = 0, .name = "moduleX", },
[1] = { .id = 1, .name = "moduleY", },
[2] = { .id = 2, .name = "moduleZ", },
...
};
mfd_add_devices(..., PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cells, ARRAY_SIZE(cells),
...);
Output (names of the devices in the drivers):
"moduleX"
"moduleY.0"
"moduleX.1"
Desired output:
"moduleX"
"moduleY"
"moduleZ"
Is it by design?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > index c57e407020f1..c9583f895058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent,
> > int id,
> > int platform_id;
> > int r;
> >
> > - if (id == PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO)
> > + if (id < 0)
> > platform_id = id;
> > else
> > platform_id = id + cell->id;
>
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists