[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323153317.GI9287@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:33:18 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
timur@...eaurora.org, nleeder@...eaurora.org,
agross@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com, msalter@...hat.com,
mlangsdo@...hat.com, ahs3@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver
Hi Agustin,
Structurally, this looks good to me.
I have a few minor comments below; with those fixed up I think this is
ready to merge.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:24:17AM -0400, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> +/*
> + * General constants
> + */
> +
> +/* Number of counters on each PMU */
> +#define L3_NUM_COUNTERS 8
> +/* Mask for the event type field within perf_event_attr.config and EVTYPE reg */
> +#define L3_MAX_EVTYPE 0xFF
Given it's a mask, it would be better to name this L3_EVTYPE_MASK.
Perhaps L3_EVTYPE_MASK, then?
[...]
> +/* L3_HML3_PM_EVTYPEx */
> +#define EVSEL(__val) ((u32)((__val) & 0xFF))
This cast can go.
[...]
> +/* L3_M_BC_CR */
> +#define BC_RESET (((u32)1) << 1)
> +#define BC_ENABLE ((u32)1)
The u32 cast is somewhat unusual. Can we please do this as:
#define BC_RESET (1UL << 1)
#define BC_ENABLE (1UL << 0)
> +
> +/* L3_M_BC_SATROLL_CR */
> +#define BC_SATROLL_CR_RESET (0)
> +
> +/* L3_M_BC_CNTENSET */
> +#define PMCNTENSET(__cntr) (((u32)1) << ((__cntr) & 0x7))
Likewise:
#define PMCNTENSET(__cntr (1UL << ((__cntr) & 0x7))
... and so on for the other definitions of this form.
[...]
> +/*
> + * Events
> + */
> +
> +#define L3_CYCLES 0x01
> +#define L3_READ_HIT 0x20
> +#define L3_READ_MISS 0x21
> +#define L3_READ_HIT_D 0x22
> +#define L3_READ_MISS_D 0x23
> +#define L3_WRITE_HIT 0x24
> +#define L3_WRITE_MISS 0x25
Can we please Please give these a L3_EVT_ (or L3_EVENT_) prefix?
Then we can add a NONE event for the odd counter in the long conter
case.
[...]
> +struct l3cache_event_ops {
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + /* Called to start event monitoring */
> + void (*start)(struct perf_event *event);
> + /* Called to stop event monitoring */
> + void (*stop)(struct perf_event *event, int flags);
> + /* Called to update the perf_event */
> + void (*update)(struct perf_event *event);
> +};
I believe the event field can go.
> +/*
> + * Implementation of long counter operations
> + *
> + * 64bit counters are implemented by chaining two of the 32bit physical
> + * counters. The PMU only supports chaining of adjacent even/odd pairs
> + * and for simplicity the driver always configures the odd counter to
> + * count the overflows of the lower-numbered even counter. Note that since
> + * the resulting hardware counter is 64bits no IRQs are required to maintain
> + * the software counter which is also 64bits.
> + */
This is a really useful comment; thanks for putting this together!
> +
> +static void qcom_l3_cache__64bit_counter_start(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct l3cache_pmu *l3pmu = to_l3cache_pmu(event->pmu);
> + int idx = event->hw.idx;
> + u32 evsel = get_event_type(event);
> + u32 gang = readl_relaxed(l3pmu->regs + L3_M_BC_GANG);
> +
> + /* Set the odd counter to count the overflows of the even counter */
> + writel_relaxed(gang | GANG_EN(idx + 1), l3pmu->regs + L3_M_BC_GANG);
Not a big deal, but could we organise this like:
/* Set the odd counter to count the overflows of the even counter */
gang = readl_relaxed(l3pmu->regs + L3_M_BC_GANG);
gang |= GANG_EN(idx + 1);
writel_relaxed(gang, l3pmu->regs + L3_M_BC_GANG);
... it makes it a little easier to spot the precise manipulation of the
register value, and easier to spot that this is an RMW sequence for the
same register.
> +
> + /* Initialize the hardware counters and reset prev_count*/
> + local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, 0);
> + writel_relaxed(0, l3pmu->regs + L3_HML3_PM_EVCNTR(idx+1));
> + writel_relaxed(0, l3pmu->regs + L3_HML3_PM_EVCNTR(idx));
Nit: please use spaces around binary operators, i.e. s/idx+1/idx + 1/g.
[...]
> +static void qcom_l3_cache__64bit_counter_update(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct l3cache_pmu *l3pmu = to_l3cache_pmu(event->pmu);
> + int idx = event->hw.idx;
> + u32 hi, lo;
> + u64 prev, now;
Nit: s/now/new/ so as to match other drivers.
[...]
> +struct l3cache_event_ops event_ops_long = {
> + .start = qcom_l3_cache__64bit_counter_start,
> + .stop = qcom_l3_cache__64bit_counter_stop,
> + .update = qcom_l3_cache__64bit_counter_update,
> +};
Please make this static const.
> +struct l3cache_event_ops event_ops_std = {
> + .start = qcom_l3_cache__32bit_counter_start,
> + .stop = qcom_l3_cache__32bit_counter_stop,
> + .update = qcom_l3_cache__32bit_counter_update,
> +};
Likewise, please make this static const.
> +
> +/* Retrieve the appropriate operations for the given event */
> +static struct l3cache_event_ops *l3cache_event_get_ops(struct perf_event *event)
This will need to return a const pointer for the ops changes above.
[...]
> +static int qcom_l3_cache_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct l3cache_pmu *l3pmu;
> + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> + struct resource *memrc;
> + int rc;
Nit: please use ret rather than rc. I'd like to align the PMU drivers on
this convention.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists