linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Add option to mount only a pids subset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEiveUcj6d7mJKRHJs73T7Z1-qRgqE+xsMc1NDivFKeJhjMeJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:06:28 +0100
From:   Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>
To:     Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add option to mount only a pids subset

Hi Alexey,

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alexey Gladkov
<gladkov.alexey@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> Al Viro, this patch looks better ?
>
> == Overview ==
>
> Some of the container virtualization systems are mounted /proc inside
> the container. This is done in most cases to operate with information
> about the processes. Knowing that /proc filesystem is not fully
> virtualized they are mounted on top of dangerous places empty files or
> directories (for exmaple /proc/sys, /proc/kcore, /sys/firmware, etc.).
>
> The structure of this filesystem is dynamic and any module can create a
> new object which will not necessarily be virtualized. There are
> proprietary modules that aren't in the mainline whose work we can not
> verify.
>
> This opens up a potential threat to the system. The developers of the
> virtualization system can't predict all dangerous places in /proc by
> definition.
>
> A more effective solution would be to mount into the container only what
> is necessary and ignore the rest.
>
> Right now there is the opportunity to pass in the container any port of
> the /proc filesystem using mount --bind expect the pids.
>
> This patch allows to mount only the part of /proc related to pids without
> rest objects. Since this is an option for /proc, flags applied to /proc
> have an effect on this subset of filesystem.

I just sent a patch that also has to deal with proc hidepid here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/505

I'm not sure if that's the right approach, it is still buggy, however
seems that your patch also stores the mount option inside the
pid_namespace which may get propagated to all mounts inside same pidns
?

I didn't have enough time but maybe if they are related we can work it
out together ?

Thank you!


-- 
tixxdz