linux-kernel - Re: next build: 208 builds: 9 failed, 199 passed, 857 errors, 444 warnings (next-20170323)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0OHuqV-iK0T3BaYnsNgT2RDpAgpa5vQEFneEZZ65Dn9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:19:14 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc:     kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        "Steven J. Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: next build: 208 builds: 9 failed, 199 passed, 857 errors, 444
 warnings (next-20170323)

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org> wrote:

> acs5k_defconfig (arm) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Warnings:
> :1328:2: warning: #warning syscall arch_prctl not implemented [-Wcpp]
> :1328:2: warning: #warning syscall arch_prctl not implemented [-Wcpp]

patch sent today, we don't really want this syscall except on x86

> allmodconfig (arm64) — FAIL, 6 errors, 5 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Errors:
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_f_clk_pins"
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_ao_a_3_pins"
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_f_clk_pins"
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_ao_a_3_pins"
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)

Kevin has already backed out the commit that caused this.

> Warnings:
> :1325:2: warning: #warning syscall statx not implemented [-Wcpp]

Should get fixed in the next few days when the patch gets picked up for arm64.

> drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c:232:17: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]

patch sent today

> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:32:26: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:32:26: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]

I sent this one a few days ago

> allmodconfig (x86) — PASS, 0 errors, 11 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Warnings:
> drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:489:18: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
> drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:489:18: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 5 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]

This one too.

> cavium_octeon_defconfig (mips) — FAIL, 830 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Errors:
> arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx-mio-defs.h:78:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__BITFIELD_FIELD'
> arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx-mio-defs.h:95:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__BITFIELD_FIELD'

Maybe caused by 4cd156de2ca8 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused MIO types
and macros.")
I have not looked in detail

> net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1339:1: warning: the frame size of 2544 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:1399:1: warning: the frame size of 2208 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:1888:1: warning: the frame size of 3840 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:4429:1: warning: the frame size of 2240 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]

Still need to rework my patches.

    Arnd