[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58D41BC1.9070203@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:02:25 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: Query on DT overlay support.
(Adding Pantelis and dgibson to cc.)
On 03/23/17 11:32, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Nava kishore Manne
> <nava.manne@...inx.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This mail is regarding the DT overlay support in the Linux
>> kernel
>>
>> I am able to make the device-tree overlay work out of box by
>> using my own dtc complier (I mean I used the dtc compiler
>>
>> Available here
>> http://www.embedded-things.com/bbb/patching-the-device-tree-compiler-for-ubuntu/
>> )
>>
>> When can I expect the same changes in the scripts/dtc in
>> mainline????
>>
>> In case of any support needed for testing I can help on
>> testing the same I works in Xilinx and we had a lot of combinations to test
>> overlay J
>
> It's already there. Landed in 4.11.
>
> Rob
>
One dtc feature that is still missing is what Pantelis calls "syntatic sugar".
His patch for that has not yet been accepted into the dtc project if I have
been following along correctly.
Without the syntactic sugar, the source .dts has to expose the details
of the fragment and __overlay__ nodes.
-Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists