linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] 4.11.0-rc1 panic on shutdown X61s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL3LdT6CbZkyngugiPCqhNvT02tsTWsWfMT4KH41hrAEE3evAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:18:31 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     lkml@...garu.com, "Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>,
        "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        "vcaputo@...garu.com" <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Singleton <davsingl@...co.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        khalidm <khalidm@...co.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] 4.11.0-rc1 panic on shutdown X61s

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> (Readding Jeff Kirsher who got dropped from the CC-list at some point.)
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:13:43PM -0700, lkml@...garu.com wrote:
>> > This is still broken as of 4.11.0-rc3 FYI.
>> >
>> > Upon resume:
>> > [   45.828344] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> > [   45.828352] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 807 at drivers/pci/msi.c:1052 __pci_enable_msi_range+0x39c/0x3f0
>> > [   45.828355] CPU: 0 PID: 807 Comm: kworker/u4:29 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc3 #52
>> > [   45.828356] Hardware name: LENOVO 7668CTO/7668CTO, BIOS 7NETC2WW (2.22 ) 03/22/2011
>> > [   45.828360] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
>> > [   45.828362] Call Trace:
>> > [   45.828366]  dump_stack+0x4d/0x72
>> > [   45.828369]  __warn+0xc7/0xf0
>> > [   45.828371]  warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20
>> > [   45.828372]  __pci_enable_msi_range+0x39c/0x3f0
>> > [   45.828375]  ? e1000e_get_phy_info_igp+0x1c/0xf0
>> > [   45.828377]  pci_enable_msi+0x15/0x30
>> > [   45.828379]  e1000e_set_interrupt_capability+0xe0/0x130
>> > [   45.828381]  e1000e_pm_thaw+0x1d/0x50
>> > [   45.828383]  e1000e_pm_resume+0x20/0x30
>> > [   45.828386]  pci_pm_resume+0x5f/0x90
>> > [   45.828389]  dpm_run_callback+0x44/0x170
>> > [   45.828391]  ? pci_pm_thaw+0x90/0x90
>> > [   45.828393]  device_resume+0xce/0x1e0
>> > [   45.828395]  async_resume+0x18/0x40
>> > [   45.828396]  async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0xe0
>> > [   45.828399]  process_one_work+0x13b/0x3e0
>> > [   45.828400]  worker_thread+0x64/0x4a0
>> > [   45.828402]  kthread+0x10f/0x150
>> > [   45.828404]  ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
>> > [   45.828406]  ? __kthread_create_on_node+0x150/0x150
>> > [   45.828409]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40
>> > [   45.828411] ---[ end trace 56fad2d83af13529 ]---
>> > [   45.828469] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth3: Failed to initialize MSI interrupts.  Falling back to legacy interrupts.
>> > [   45.835944] PM: resume of devices complete after 364.406 msecs
>> > [   45.836001] usb 2-1:1.0: rebind failed: -517
>> > [   45.836316] PM: Finishing wakeup.
>> >
>>
>> I never reported back on the results of reverting 7e54d9d063fa, it seems to fix
>> the problem on my machine as well.
>
> Right, so I think we should revert soonish. That is, if you guys don't
> have a fix yet. You can always try again during the next merge window.
> Right now, I'm not testing -rc kernels on this box because of this. I
> can always blacklist the networking driver but what good is that box
> then...
>

I have sent a patch to revert this offending commit through David
Miller's net tree, sorry for the delay on this, I thought I had seen a
patch to revert the offending commit earlier which is why I did not
send this earlier.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff