[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324085931.7hvhrs2emqu5k5mr@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:59:31 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/26] x86/mm: allow to have userspace mappings above
47-bits
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:08:41AM -0700, hpa@...or.com wrote:
> This *better* be conditional on some kind of settable limit. Having a
> barrier in the middle of the address space for no apparent reason to
> "clean" software is insane.
I had the same argument (on your side) before, but if you look on numbers
it's far from the middle of address space. The barrier is around 0.2% from
the start 56-bit address space.
And it's we have vdso/vvar/stack just below the barier anyway.
I don't think we would loose much if wouldn't not allow VMA to sit
across it.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists