[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324090757.inkuvayf5t7g73po@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:07:57 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/kasan: Prepare clear_pgds() to switch to
<asm-generic/pgtable-nop4d.h>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> > On 03/17/2017 09:55 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > With folded p4d, pgd_clear() is nop. Change clear_pgds() to use
> > > p4d_clear() instead.
> > >
> >
> > You could probably just use set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(start), __pgd(0)); instead of pgd_clear()
> > as we already do in arm64.
> > It's basically pgd_clear() except it's not a nop wih p4d folded.
>
> Makes sense. Kirill, if you agree, mind spinning a v2 patch?
I can re-spin, if you want. But honestly, I don't think such constructs
help readability.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists