[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324094034.2afxgg43wlezdka5@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:40:34 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/KASLR: EFI region is mistakenly included into
KASLR VA space for randomization
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:37:36AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> No. It is the firmware's EFI code, and the virtual translation applied
> by the OS is made known to the firmware by means of a call into the
> runtime service SetVirtualAddressMap().
We can still randomize within those 64G before calling
SetVirtualAddressMap(). The question is, do we want to or need to, even?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists