[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bba6c1dd59ee4b8aad4b1f9929f7caf0@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:16:30 +0000
From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"shawn.lin@...k-chips.com" <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zoltan Szubbocsev (zszubbocsev)" <zszubbocsev@...ron.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1] mmc: core: fix still flush cache when eMMC cache off
Hi, Uffe
>>>On 19 March 2017 at 01:45, Bean Huo (beanhuo) <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes the issue that mmc_blk_issue_rq still flushes cache
>>>> when eMMC cache has already been off through user space tool, such
>>>> as mmc-utils.
>>>> The reason is that card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl isn't reset.
>>>
>>>First, why do you want to turn of the cache ctrl? Is the eMMC device
>>>having issues with it? Then we should invent a card quirk instead.
>>
>>
>> Why I turn off it? because I did power loss testing and validation, I should
>switch it off and on.
>> When I do some performance and power loss case validation on several
>> Linux release versions, I need to switch off or on cache through user space tool.
>> I can't confirm every user that likes me, But I think at least it is
>> not reasonable to flush eMMC cache, when internal eMMC cache is off.
>
>Ah, I see. Your use-case seems reasonable while validating robustness of the
>eMMC!
>
>>
>>>Second, what errors do you encounter when the mmc core tries to flush
>>>the cache when it has been turned off? Can you please elaborate on this?
>>
>>
>> No error found, but firstly, please think about overhead introduced by
>> useless flush cache, Unless you Don't care this tiny time. second,
>> under the condition of cache off, additional flush cache request still has impact
>>on Internal eMMC logic. I don't know What and how impact, but at least it is
>>really exist.
>
>Got it!
>
>However I still don't like the mmc ioctls API to compensate and deal with all
>"crazy-ness" that user-space may cause. Cache-ctrl is only one case out of many.
Question is that not every Linux-mmc user really understand that shouldn't use "mmc ioctls API
to compensate and deal with all crazy-ness that user-space may cause ".
no matter we like or dislike, Issue is already there; I think that most of eMMC user is now
configuring eMMC through mmc-utils and mmc ioctls. This is a real condition.
Some automotive applications, Cache would not be enabled.
Maybe I am shallow, mmc ioctls likes backdoor that let user access and configure eMMC some feature,
Even not too often. I still suggest to fix this in mmc ioctls, unless mmc iotcls being deleted, and mmc-utils
doesn't support Cache off/on.
Because eMMC internal cache has been disabled, but Linux-mmc still issue flush cache request, this is indeed
Not reasonable. It definitely increases system level overhead.
>I see two viable options to solve your problem.
>1) Extend mmc_test with a new test(s) for cache ctrl and perhaps suspend/resume.
>Isn't this actually exactly what you want?
>2) Extend debugfs to be able to turn cache ctrl on/off.
I can try, but this patch is just to fix mmc ctrls backdoor on eMMC flush cache.
>[...]
>
>Kind regards
>Uffe
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of
>a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists