linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] firmware: google memconsole: Add ARM/ARM64 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170324122858.GF22771@leverpostej>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:28:59 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] firmware: google memconsole: Add ARM/ARM64 support

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:04:29PM +0100, Thierry Escande wrote:
> This patch expands the Google firmware memory console driver to also
> work on certain tree based platforms running coreboot, such as ARM/ARM64
> Chromebooks. This patch now adds another path to find the coreboot table
> through the device tree. In order to find that, a second level
> bootloader must have installed the 'coreboot' compatible device tree
> node that describes its base address and size.

What exactly is the "memory console"? Is it a log that coreboot writes into?

[...]

> +static const struct of_device_id coreboot_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "coreboot" },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver coreboot_table_of_driver = {
> +	.probe = coreboot_table_of_probe,
> +	.remove = coreboot_table_of_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "coreboot_table_of",
> +		.of_match_table = coreboot_of_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init platform_coreboot_table_of_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct device_node *of_node;
> +
> +	/* Limit device creation to the presence of /firmware/coreboot node */
> +	of_node = of_find_node_by_path("/firmware/coreboot");
> +	if (!of_node)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

I don't beleive that you need this module init function. Please use the
usual DT probing infrastrucutre instead, e.g. add:

MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, coreboot_of_match);
module_platform_driver(coreboot_table_of_driver);

Thanks,
Mark.