[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324134459.GA26275@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:44:59 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
Cc: oleg.drokin@...el.com, Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: Remove redundant code
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:09:53PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Remove the code which do not have any value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> index 18183cbb9859..b60261db9e67 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> @@ -997,11 +997,6 @@ lnet_fault_ctl(int opc, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data)
> int
> lnet_fault_init(void)
> {
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(LNET_PUT_BIT != 1 << LNET_MSG_PUT);
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(LNET_ACK_BIT != 1 << LNET_MSG_ACK);
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(LNET_GET_BIT != 1 << LNET_MSG_GET);
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(LNET_REPLY_BIT != 1 << LNET_MSG_REPLY);
Why does this not have any value? How are you ensuring that these
requirements are now being met?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists