[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324143505.GK28518@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:35:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mvebu: wrt1900ac: Use pwm-fan rather than gpio-fan
> + pwm_fan {
> /* SUNON HA4010V4-0000-C99 */
> - compatible = "gpio-fan";
> - gpios = <&gpio0 24 0>;
>
> - gpio-fan,speed-map = <0 0
> - 4500 1>;
> + compatible = "pwm-fan";
> + pwms = <&gpio0 24 4000 0>;
Hi Ralph
I believe this last 0 is the flags parameter. Now that we have
#pwm-cells = 1, i think this last 0 should be dropped.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists