lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170324154051.5398a703.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:40:51 +0100
From:   Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev() should never fail

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:33:01 -0300
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:

> Still dislike the "unregister all bus devices" as that renders the guest
> unuseable. Can't you fail gracefully? Say force qemu error.

The callers are probably too varied to find a common way to do that
(multiply with different user space tools).

At least for some cases, the guest will be terminated in the near
future anyway: For example, on s390 a NULL bus will cause an error to
be propagated through KVM_RUN on the next guest->host virtio
notification, which will cause qemu to terminate the guest.

This situation is not ideal, but this is probably the most reasonable
approach.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ