[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0+os4sNzmPYvm-MrsdppZEg9VKhQ9ROJf9DumXCHgnhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:16:43 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] arm64: Do not expose PCI mmap through procfs
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:25 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
>> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/proc.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
>> index 2d9cfa4..a940f4b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>>
>> static int proc_initialized; /* = 0 */
>>
>> +#ifdef __aarch64__
>> +/* ARM64 wants to be special and not expose this through /proc like everyone else */
>> +#undef HAVE_PCI_MMAP
>> +#endif
>
> I'd still prefer this to be a whitelist of the existing architectures using PCI
> MMAP in procfs, there is really no reason for arm64 to be special, the
> one thing we want to control here is whether new architectures (including
> arm64) that have never had either the sysfs or the procfs interface
> should get one or both of them.
>
> As it seems that there are important use cases for the sysfs interface
> and your patch series will just make that work everywhere, I'd argue
> that we should just always provide the sysfs interface now, and use
> HAVE_PCI_MMAP only control the procfs interface.
>
> That way, we turn on the sysfs interface on arc, arm64, frv and tile
> as well as any future architecture with PCI support, but leave
> the procfs support as opt-in.
Something alone these lines, to replace your patch 17/17 and the
one that turns on HAVE_PCI_MMAP for arm64.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 25d010d449a3..c517f1b724e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ void pci_remove_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
}
#endif /* HAVE_PCI_LEGACY */
-#ifdef HAVE_PCI_MMAP
-
int pci_mmap_fits(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
enum pci_mmap_api mmap_api)
{
@@ -1217,10 +1215,6 @@ static int pci_create_resource_files(struct
pci_dev *pdev)
}
return 0;
}
-#else /* !HAVE_PCI_MMAP */
-int __weak pci_create_resource_files(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; }
-void __weak pci_remove_resource_files(struct pci_dev *dev) { return; }
-#endif /* HAVE_PCI_MMAP */
/**
* pci_write_rom - used to enable access to the PCI ROM display
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 8dd38e69d6f2..6c2a15d4ebf9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -21,14 +21,12 @@ void pci_create_firmware_label_files(struct pci_dev *pdev);
void pci_remove_firmware_label_files(struct pci_dev *pdev);
#endif
void pci_cleanup_rom(struct pci_dev *dev);
-#ifdef HAVE_PCI_MMAP
enum pci_mmap_api {
PCI_MMAP_SYSFS, /* mmap on /sys/bus/pci/devices/<BDF>/resource<N> */
PCI_MMAP_PROCFS /* mmap on /proc/bus/pci/<BDF> */
};
int pci_mmap_fits(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno, struct vm_area_struct *vmai,
enum pci_mmap_api mmap_api);
-#endif
int pci_probe_reset_function(struct pci_dev *dev);
/**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists