[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324170753.15226.91099.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:07:53 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next PATCH v3 1/8] net: Busy polling should ignore sender CPUs
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
This patch is a cleanup/fix for NAPI IDs following the changes that made it
so that sender_cpu and napi_id were doing a better job of sharing the same
location in the sk_buff.
One issue I found is that we weren't validating the napi_id as being valid
before we started trying to setup the busy polling. This change corrects
that by using the MIN_NAPI_ID value that is now used in both allocating the
NAPI IDs, as well as validating them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 +++++++--
net/core/dev.c | 13 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index c0452de83086..3fcda9e70c3f 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
extern unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_read __read_mostly;
extern unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_poll __read_mostly;
+/* 0 - Reserved to indicate value not set
+ * 1..NR_CPUS - Reserved for sender_cpu
+ * NR_CPUS+1..~0 - Region available for NAPI IDs
+ */
+#define MIN_NAPI_ID ((unsigned int)(NR_CPUS + 1))
+
static inline bool net_busy_loop_on(void)
{
return sysctl_net_busy_poll;
@@ -58,10 +64,9 @@ static inline unsigned long busy_loop_end_time(void)
static inline bool sk_can_busy_loop(const struct sock *sk)
{
- return sk->sk_ll_usec && sk->sk_napi_id && !signal_pending(current);
+ return sk->sk_ll_usec && !signal_pending(current);
}
-
static inline bool busy_loop_timeout(unsigned long end_time)
{
unsigned long now = busy_loop_us_clock();
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7869ae3837ca..ab337bf5bbf4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5066,15 +5066,20 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
int (*napi_poll)(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget);
void *have_poll_lock = NULL;
struct napi_struct *napi;
+ unsigned int napi_id;
int rc;
restart:
+ napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id);
+ if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID)
+ return 0;
+
rc = false;
napi_poll = NULL;
rcu_read_lock();
- napi = napi_by_id(sk->sk_napi_id);
+ napi = napi_by_id(napi_id);
if (!napi)
goto out;
@@ -5143,10 +5148,10 @@ static void napi_hash_add(struct napi_struct *napi)
spin_lock(&napi_hash_lock);
- /* 0..NR_CPUS+1 range is reserved for sender_cpu use */
+ /* 0..NR_CPUS range is reserved for sender_cpu use */
do {
- if (unlikely(++napi_gen_id < NR_CPUS + 1))
- napi_gen_id = NR_CPUS + 1;
+ if (unlikely(++napi_gen_id < MIN_NAPI_ID))
+ napi_gen_id = MIN_NAPI_ID;
} while (napi_by_id(napi_gen_id));
napi->napi_id = napi_gen_id;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists