[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170324171350.9953-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:13:50 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: alban.auzeill@...arsource.com, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: remove redundant range check min_uV > 1300000 && min_uV <= 1350000
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
It has been pointed out to me that the range for vsel = 58 is actually
dead code as this is covered by an earlier check for (min_uV >= 700000)
&& (min_uV <= 1420000) so remove that check completely.
Reported-by: Alban Auzeill <alban.auzeill@...arsource.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
index 716191046a70..56aada387887 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
@@ -456,8 +456,6 @@ static int twl6030smps_map_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
vsel = 60;
else if ((min_uV > 1350000) && (min_uV <= 1500000))
vsel = 59;
- else if ((min_uV > 1300000) && (min_uV <= 1350000))
- vsel = 58;
else
return -EINVAL;
break;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists