[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170324151222.581920745@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:59:07 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 28/30] gfs2: Avoid alignment hole in struct lm_lockname
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
commit 28ea06c46fbcab63fd9a55531387b7928a18a590 upstream.
Commit 88ffbf3e03 switches to using rhashtables for glocks, hashing over
the entire struct lm_lockname instead of its individual fields. On some
architectures, struct lm_lockname contains a hole of uninitialized
memory due to alignment rules, which now leads to incorrect hash values.
Get rid of that hole.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/gfs2/incore.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct lm_lockname {
struct gfs2_sbd *ln_sbd;
u64 ln_number;
unsigned int ln_type;
-};
+} __packed __aligned(sizeof(int));
#define lm_name_equal(name1, name2) \
(((name1)->ln_number == (name2)->ln_number) && \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists