[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxhdJTRwCQUissDm24k4B-sLL0mi-92v93giJqfVFke6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:08:10 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: locking/atomic: Introduce atomic_try_cmpxchg()
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:34:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I just noticed that at least your other one didn't mark "success"
>> as being likely.
>
> 10730509 4540256 843776 16114541 f5e36d defconfig-build/vmlinux
Ok, that seems to be the exact same size as with the patch using the
"goto label" approach. So maybe the code generation is the same now.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists