[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324210853.12268442@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:08:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:04:42 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> On (03/21/17 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > so we probably can
> >
> >
> > 1) move pr_info() out of zone->lock in __offline_isolated_pages().
> > meh...
> >
> >
> > 2) switch to printk_deferred() in __offline_isolated_pages().
> > meh.. there might a bunch of other printks done from under zone->lock.
> >
> >
> > 3) move add_timer() out of sclp_con_lock console in sclp_console_write().
> > well, there can be other consoles that do something similar.
> >
> >
> > 4) ... something smart.
>
>
> Sebastian, does this change make lockdep happy?
>
> it removes console drivers from the __offline_isolated_pages(). not the
> best solution I can think of, but the simplest one.
>
> ---
>
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f749b7ff7c50..eb61e6ab5f4f 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7705,7 +7705,7 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page));
> order = page_order(page);
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> - pr_info("remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
> + printk_deferred(KERN_INFO "remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
> pfn, 1 << order, end_pfn);
> #endif
> list_del(&page->lru);
My fear is that this will trigger for any printk in page_alloc.c under
the zone lock.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists