[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170324.192336.1475562799079946827.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/8] Add busy poll support for epoll
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:07:47 -0700
> v3: Split off the code for limiting busy_poll and busy_read into a separate
> patch for net.
> Updated patch that changed busy loop time tracking so that it uses
> "local_clock() >> 10" as we originally did.
> Tweaked "Change return type.." patch by moving declaration of "work"
> inside the loop where is was accessed and always reset to 0.
> Added "Acked-by" for patches that received acks.
Eric, I believe Alexander has addresed your concerns. Could you please
review patches 5 and 7 and ACK if they look ok to you?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists