lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:51:28 +0200 From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org> To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dwc3 - bug fixes and use meaningful goto labels Hi, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> writes: > This patch series consists of two fixes and changes to goto labels we *NEVER* put cleanups and fixes together. > to use meaningful names. > > While working on goto label changes, I noticed put_sync calls without > successful get_sync in error legs. The first two patches are the fixes > and the rest of the patches are goto label changes. so, you mean to say that you're adding regressions because you *THOUGHT* there was a bug there, right? Read the docs ;-) -- balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists