[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87poh523r3.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:51:28 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dwc3 - bug fixes and use meaningful goto labels
Hi,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> writes:
> This patch series consists of two fixes and changes to goto labels
we *NEVER* put cleanups and fixes together.
> to use meaningful names.
>
> While working on goto label changes, I noticed put_sync calls without
> successful get_sync in error legs. The first two patches are the fixes
> and the rest of the patches are goto label changes.
so, you mean to say that you're adding regressions because you *THOUGHT*
there was a bug there, right? Read the docs ;-)
--
balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists