[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170326230140.68b9e60f@nowhere>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:01:40 +0200
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 2/9] sched/deadline: improve the tracking of active
utilization
Hi Mathieu,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 11:32:59 -0600
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
[...]
> > + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
> > + put_task_struct(p);
> > +
> > + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void init_inactive_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
>
> To be consistent with the other DL related functions:
>
> s/init_inactive_task_timer(...)/init_dl_inactive_task_timer(...)
Thanks; I'll change the name of this function.
Thanks,
Luca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists