linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: add stub for of_n_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1C=ffeg7CgmpgZauYiaUYL1vQNa=5yA7_Eefkc-bKLVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:31:09 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Tobias Regnery <tobias.regnery@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: add stub for of_n_addr_cells

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Regnery
<tobias.regnery@...il.com> wrote:
> On 24.03.17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>> >
>> > +static inline int of_n_addr_cells(struct device_node *np)
>> > +{
>> > +       return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>>
>> This looks good, but we should also do the same thing for of_n_size_cells().
>>
>> I think I sent something like this a few years ago, but never resubmitted it
>> when it was ignored at first.
>>
>>         Arnd
>
> This seems sensible, I can send an updated patch with this change or I can
> send it as a separate patch, whatever the maintainers prefer.

I'd recommend sending an updated patch.

       Arnd