linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH tip/master V2 7/8] kprobes/x86: Use probe_kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <149060142278.12303.16404609814924093379.stgit@devbox>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:57:17 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH tip/master V2 7/8] kprobes/x86: Use probe_kernel_read instead of memcpy

Use probe_kernel_read() for avoiding unexpected faults while
copying kernel text in __recover_probed_insn(),
__recover_optprobed_insn() and __copy_instruction().

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
  Note that this is just an update patch which I had been
  sent to LKML last month ( https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/27/294 )
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |   12 +++++++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c  |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 3238752..a9ae61a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ __recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
 	 * Fortunately, we know that the original code is the ideal 5-byte
 	 * long NOP.
 	 */
-	memcpy(buf, (void *)addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
+	if (probe_kernel_read(buf, (void *)addr,
+		MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)))
+		return 0UL;
+
 	if (faddr)
 		memcpy(buf, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], 5);
 	else
@@ -271,7 +274,7 @@ __recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
  * Recover the probed instruction at addr for further analysis.
  * Caller must lock kprobes by kprobe_mutex, or disable preemption
  * for preventing to release referencing kprobes.
- * Returns zero if the instruction can not get recovered.
+ * Returns zero if the instruction can not get recovered (or access failed).
  */
 unsigned long recover_probed_instruction(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
 {
@@ -365,7 +368,10 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
 	/* Another subsystem puts a breakpoint, failed to recover */
 	if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)
 		return 0;
-	memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, length);
+
+	/* This can access kernel text if given address is not recovered */
+	if (kernel_probe_read(dest, insn.kaddr, length))
+		return 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	/* Only x86_64 has RIP relative instructions */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
index b121037..5b52334 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ unsigned long __recover_optprobed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
 	 * overwritten by jump destination address. In this case, original
 	 * bytes must be recovered from op->optinsn.copied_insn buffer.
 	 */
-	memcpy(buf, (void *)addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
+	if (probe_kernel_read(buf, (void *)addr,
+		MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)))
+		return 0UL;
+
 	if (addr == (unsigned long)kp->addr) {
 		buf[0] = kp->opcode;
 		memcpy(buf + 1, op->optinsn.copied_insn, RELATIVE_ADDR_SIZE);