[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170327082440.6lvb7il66mzdaij5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:24:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: switch to BUG_ON()
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:40:46AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Found by coccinelle: bugon.cocci
> ./kernel/sched/core.c:5913:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
Right, so I disagree with that here.
> @@ -5909,8 +5909,8 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
> mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
>
> /* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
> - if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, non_isolated_cpus) < 0)
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, non_isolated_cpus) < 0);
> +
> sched_init_granularity();
> free_cpumask_var(non_isolated_cpus);
If the condition were without side effects, that pattern would hold, but
here the function call set_cpus_allowed_ptr() is very much not a pure
function, so wrapping it in a BUG_ON() just fels wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists