[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170327052138.GG9308@localhost>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:51:38 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: jiada_wang@...tor.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel
is stopped
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:12:09PM -0700, jiada_wang@...tor.com wrote:
> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
>
> sdma_disable_channel() cannot ensure dma is stopped to access
> module's FIFOs. There is chance SDMA core is running and accessing
> BD when disable of corresponding channel, this may cause sometimes
> even after call of .sdma_disable_channel(), SDMA core still be
> running and accessing module's FIFOs.
>
> According to NXP R&D team a delay of one BD SDMA cost time (maximum
> is 1ms) should be added after disable of the channel bit, to ensure
> SDMA core has really been stopped after SDMA clients call
> .device_terminate_all.
>
> This patch introduces adds a new function sdma_disable_channel_with_delay()
> which simply adds 1ms delay after call sdma_disable_channel(),
> and set it as .device_terminate_all.
Applied after fixing the subsystem name.
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists