linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: switch to atomic PWM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170327150237.69d8523f@bbrezillon>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:02:37 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <cristian.birsan@...rochip.com>,
        <andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com>, <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: switch to atomic PWM

Hi Claudiu,

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:29:34 +0200
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com> wrote:

>  static const struct platform_device_id atmel_pwm_devtypes[] = {
>  	{
>  		.name = "at91sam9rl-pwm",
> -		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v1,
> +		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v1,
>  	}, {
>  		.name = "sama5d3-pwm",
> -		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v2,
> +		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v2,
>  	}, {
>  		/* sentinel */
>  	},

Unrelated to this series, but can you prepare a patch to get rid of
this platform id table (AT91 platforms have completely switched to DT
for quite some time now).

You can also get rid of the "if (pdev->dev.of_node)" condition in
atmel_pwm_probe() since it's guaranteed to be true, otherwise the
->probe() method wouldn't be called.

Thanks,

Boris