[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8477b3ae-7841-db0b-1faa-7c0dfa452082@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:44:26 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dwc3 - bug fixes and use meaningful goto labels
On 03/25/2017 01:51 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> writes:
>> This patch series consists of two fixes and changes to goto labels
>
> we *NEVER* put cleanups and fixes together.
>
>> to use meaningful names.
>>
>> While working on goto label changes, I noticed put_sync calls without
>> successful get_sync in error legs. The first two patches are the fixes
>> and the rest of the patches are goto label changes.
>
> so, you mean to say that you're adding regressions because you *THOUGHT*
> there was a bug there, right? Read the docs ;-)
>
Sorry for the noise. Thanks for pointing this out.
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists