linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170327140507.GN10289@e106622-lin>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:05:07 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:     Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...il.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity
 and dl in cpudl_find

Hi,

On 23/03/17 19:32, Byungchul Park wrote:
> cpudl_find() is used to find a cpu having the latest dl. The function
> should return the latest cpu among ones satisfying task's affinity and
> dl constraint, but current code gives up immediately and just return
> fail when it fails at the test *only with* the maximum cpu.
> 
> For example:
> 
>    cpu 0 is running a task (dl: 10).
>    cpu 1 is running a task (dl: 9).
>    cpu 2 is running a task (dl: 8).
>    cpu 3 is running a task (dl: 2).
> 
>    where cpu 3 want to push a task (affinity is 1 2 3 and dl is 1).

Hummm, but this should only happen if you disable admission control,
right? Otherwise task's affinity can't be smaller that 0-3.

> 
> In this case, the task should be migrated from cpu 3 to cpu 1, and
> preempt cpu 1's task. However, current code just returns fail because
> it fails at the affinity test with the maximum cpu, that is, cpu 0.
> 
> This patch set tries to find the best among ones satisfying task's
> affinity and dl constraint until success or no more to see.
> 

Anyway, do you have numbers showing how common is you fail scenario?
It would be interesting to understand how much the slow path is actually
used, IMHO.

Thanks,

- Juri