[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170327143049.GG10760@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:30:50 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
Moreno Bartalucci <moreno.bartalucci@...norama.it>,
Lars Melin <larsm17@...il.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-musb: keep VBUS on when device is disconnected
* Bin Liu <b-liu@...com> [170327 06:22]:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Moreno Bartalucci wrote:
> > > Il giorno 25 mar 2017, alle ore 08:21, Lars Melin <larsm17@...il.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> The usb device has been disconnected, why it still cares about VBUS
> > >> power?
> > >
> > > Morphing devices (3G dongles, wifi dongles, some printers) boots up in install mode, usually only as a virtual cd-rom containing Windows drivers and software.
> > > [...]
> > > why a host only configured port should cut the VBUS supply, it could be always on right?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, that’s exactly the problem I tried to solve with this patch.
>
> Yeah, the problem is clear to me now.
Ah so it's with the state changing devices.
> > I have to add that the problem was not there with kernels up to
> > 4.8.17, I started to see it with 4.9 and up.
> >
> > By git-bisecting kernel sources, it appears this behaviour has been
> > introduced by this commit:
> >
> > 2f3fd2c5bde1f94513c3dc311ae64494085ec371
>
> It seems this patch changes how OTG_STATE_A_WAIT_VRISE and
> OTG_STATE_A_WAIT_BCON are used.
> >
> > I also agree that, in my opinion, a host only port should never remove
> > the VBUS supply, as it happens on all the PCs (linux+windows+mac) that
> > I tested until now.
>
> True. It is just that the musb driver handles both dual-role and
> host-only mode.
Maybe the other way to fix it would be to keep VBUS on longer when
checking for connected devices. Maybe we now recheck based on the
poll_timeout too early and then nothing is found.
> > I saw this problem on a beaglebone black. Of course I’m available to
> > do all the tests that you might suggest me to help you better
> > understand the issue.
>
> Thanks for the offer. Please let me look at the problem first, I have a
> modem to test.
> It is not clear why the original driver clears VBUS in this place, so I
> have to ensure your patch is the correct change.
I wonder if the following test patch allows the mode changing
devices to been properly found? Of course it's just for testing,
and scanning for devices takes now 5 seconds.. But it might
provide clues why musb thinks no devices are connected and we
cut VBUS.
Regards,
Tony
8< ----------------------
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static const struct dsps_musb_wrapper am33xx_driver_data = {
.rxep_shift = 16,
.rxep_mask = 0xfffe,
.rxep_bitmap = (0xfffe << 16),
- .poll_timeout = 2000, /* ms */
+ .poll_timeout = 5000, /* ms */
};
static const struct of_device_id musb_dsps_of_match[] = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists