[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544a9efa-a9b5-326e-4930-b185ab51644c@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:16:31 -0400
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: qt1070 - Add OF device ID table
Hello Dmitry,
On 03/23/2017 06:45 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:14:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Dmitry,
>>
>> On 02/22/2017 11:40 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
>>> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
>>> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
>>> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
>>>
>>> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
>>> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
>>>
>>> The compatible strings don't have a vendor prefix because that's how it's
>>> used currently, and changing this will be a Device Tree ABI break.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>> What's your decision about this patch series?
>
> OK, I queued them for -next. Could you also make a patch to update
Great, thanks a lot!
> binding docs for silead?
>
Of course, I will.
> Thanks!
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists