[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2r31id5gn.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:55:52 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/24] 4.9.18-stable review
Hi Javier,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> writes:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On 03/24/2017 08:57 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> + Sjoerd, Javier,
>>
>> kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org> writes:
>>
>>> stable-rc boot: 233 boots: 1 failed, 222 passed with 10 offline (v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8)
>>>
>>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8/
>>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8/
>>>
>>> Tree: stable-rc
>>> Branch: local/linux-4.9.y
>>> Git Describe: v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8
>>> Git Commit: 4d90baeca3c8aebdcb6e3ec8a6b31d4279cfbf3d
>>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>> Tested: 62 unique boards, 16 SoC families, 24 builds out of 199
>>>
>>> Boot Regressions Detected:
>>>
>>> arm:
>>>
>>> exynos_defconfig:
>>> exynos5250-snow:
>>> lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9.17)
>>
>> This one a new regression, but this board is in the Collabora lab and I
>> can't currently bisect remotely.
>>
>> @Sjoerd, Javier: can either of you have a closer look at this?
>>
>> Looks like a failure in the DRM component init path.
>>
>
> This seems to be the bug that's fixed by commit f0a8b49c03d2 ("drm/bridge:
> analogix dp: Fix runtime PM state on driver bind") [0]. I thought it was
> only a regression for v4.10, but it looks like that also affects v4.9.
Thanks for checking.
Do you plan to request a backport to stable v4.9 also?
Thanks,
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists