linux-kernel - Re: [v2 5/5] mm: teach platforms not to zero struct pages memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170327060032.GB5092@osiris>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:00:32 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [v2 5/5] mm: teach platforms not to zero struct pages memory

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:19:52PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> If we are using deferred struct page initialization feature, most of
> "struct page"es are getting initialized after other CPUs are started, and
> hence we are benefiting from doing this job in parallel. However, we are
> still zeroing all the memory that is allocated for "struct pages" using the
> boot CPU.  This patch solves this problem, by deferring zeroing "struct
> pages" to only when they are initialized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c |    2 +-
>  arch/s390/mm/vmem.c       |    2 +-
>  arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c   |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c     |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> index eb4c270..24faf2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node)
>  		if (vmemmap_populated(start, page_size))
>  			continue;
> 
> -		p = vmemmap_alloc_block(page_size, node, true);
> +		p = vmemmap_alloc_block(page_size, node, VMEMMAP_ZERO);
>  		if (!p)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
> index 9c75214..ffe9ba1 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node)
>  				void *new_page;
> 
>  				new_page = vmemmap_alloc_block(PMD_SIZE, node,
> -							       true);
> +							       VMEMMAP_ZERO);
>  				if (!new_page)
>  					goto out;
>  				pmd_val(*pm_dir) = __pa(new_page) | sgt_prot;

s390 has two call sites that need to be converted, like you did in one of
your previous patches. The same seems to be true for powerpc, unless there
is a reason to not convert them?