lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tw6e4o75.fsf@dmlp.sw.ru>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:35:58 +0300
From:   Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     dgilbert@...erlog.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: scsi_debug: shared dev context, BUG or FEATURE?

Hi scsi_debug has very strange structure
from one point it supports dynamic number of devices
but from other point context is common for all devices:
 - dif_storep (array of t10 dif tuples)
 - map_storep (block map for thinprovision)
 - fake_storep (in memory data storage)
 - sdebug_q_arr (queue array)
So basically we may have many devices with single context which refers
common data. Are any sane reason to share context between devices?
Who use such behaviour?

IMHO this is a pure bug. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'll plan to
fix that by allocation separate context for each dev. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ