linux-kernel - [REGRESSION][Stable][v3.12.y][v4.4.y][v4.9.y][v4.10.y][v4.11-rc1] scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5df6cd65-92d5-e4c5-56e3-771643f86861@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:22:09 -0400
From:   Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To:     longli@...rosoft.com
Cc:     KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION][Stable][v3.12.y][v4.4.y][v4.9.y][v4.10.y][v4.11-rc1]
 scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

Hi Long Li,

A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel
bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:

commit 40630f462824ee24bc00d692865c86c3828094e0
Author: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 14 18:46:03 2016 -0800

    scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

The regression was introduced in mainline as of v4.11-rc1.  It was also
cc'd to stable and has landed in v3.12.y, v4.4.y, v4.9.y and v4.10.y.

This regression seems pretty severe since it's preventing virtual
machines from booting.  It's affecting a couple of users so far.  I was
hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do you
think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue, or
would it be best to submit a revert request?

Thanks,

Joe

[0] http://pad.lv/1674635